![]() |
"To go Windows or not to go Windows, that is the question" You've put aside the Wall Street Journal's report that Apple's marketshare has dropped from 5 to 3 1/2 %, you've ignored PC Novice's May issue figures showing that Macintosh (Mac) sales have declined 21% in North America, whereas Windows sales are on the rise, you've thrown out MacWorld's report that Apple's layoffs have pared a 17,400 workforce at the end of 1995 to 9,300 worldwide (55% of the cuts are from the U.S. workforce), but when the cover page of Wired's June issue paints an Apple logo with the crown of thorns above the words, "pray", now you're worried. Even if Apple decides to adapt one or two of Wired's 101 last ditch suggestions for salvation, where does this leave you, a small business owner, who has invested in Mac operating system and computers from day one? Can you, should you, wait until mid-1998, to run Apple's updated operating system (Rhapsody) even if Apple keeps its promises, which is questionable based on it's track record? Do you have the patience of Job? Are there still valid reasons for staying with Mac over Windows? Are the reasons that Mac owners originally chose it over Windows still valid today? Or is now the time to jump ship and change to Windows? "They had
the best operating system and most intuitive interface out there",
said Eric Ehrhardt, a systems integrator from Western N.Y. Computing
Systems, when he chose Mac in the late 80's. Would he still choose the
Mac today? Despite Apple's lack of development of their platform, and
the arrival of Windows 95, Ehrhardt still believes the Mac operating
system is superior. "True, Windows 95 is very intuitive and much
closer to the Mac interface, but it still has problems integrating 3rd
party options, despite "plug n' play" which is supposed to
address this," he explained. Comparing the two platforms used to
be like comparing apples to oranges, but now that the learning curve
is virtually synonymous between a Mac 7.5 operating system and Windows
95, the deciding factor of one operating system over the other is not
user interface. For Ehrhardt, who has no more allegiance to one system
than the other for his clients, the choice "depends first on the
client's application (what they are using it for) and second, on what
software is available to do what they need to do". According to one
systems administrator, whether Macintosh stays in the graphics industry
is dependent on three things: Adobe (which makes most of the fonts),
the printing industry, and the development of Java Script. Adobe is
putting a lot of effort into Acrobat, which would solve the font/file
problem. If it becomes the standard of the printing industry in the
future, printers could then accept both Mac and Windows files. The other
threat to the Mac is Java Script, which lets applications run on top
of the operating system so everything is cross compatible. So, if the
printing industry drops Macintosh because of these technology changes
(Acrobat, Java) or because as Apple's market share diminishes, less
software is made for Apple, then small business owners in the graphics
industry will need to follow suit. But the big companies will leave
Macintosh before small business owners, and it will happen first with
the printers. For Terry Palis,
president of Corporate Communications, output, networking and file sharing
were the decisive factors when he first chose an IBM compatible computer
ten years ago. His company creates slides to output on film. At the
time, Apple didn't address outputting to hi- res film recorders, so
an IBM compatible computer was the obvious choice. Although Macintosh
eventually caught up, Palis knew that in order to trade files with clients
in the business community, he needed to stay Windows. He agrees that
the Mac operating system does have an advantage, but it's downside (less
software, fewer new versions, less peripherals) far outweighs this,
especially if you consider that the business world is predominately
Windows. Software developers will continue to produce for Windows because
their market potential is greater. Palis's perspective illustrates the
fact that DOS/Windows has grown from manufacturing and business, whereas
the Mac is graphics/ease of use oriented, appealing more to creative
types who want to deal with the artistic, not the inner workings of
a computer. These separate worlds have separate platforms which are
only now coming together. As for the future, most feel Mac will survive, but not as we've known it. It depends on how technological inventions and Apple's management team play things out in the next few years. As a Mac owner myself, despite feeling it is a better operating system, there's simply more software available for Windows. But, since I really can't spend the time or money on a new computer, I'm taking Wired's lead... and praying.
|
|
Home
| Qigong
| Writing
| Video
Copyright 2008 Wendy Smith Cinemagic Productions 10 Manhattan Sq. Dr. #12d Rochester NY 14607 (585) 546-3063 wendy@wendysmith.com |